Hi, About this:
> Second, let’s hear some proposals for addressing the second milestone. > > 2) Specify the subset of those Transport Services, as identified > in item 1, that end systems supporting TAPS will provide, and > give guidance on choosing among available mechanisms and > protocols. Note that not all the capabilities of IETF Transport > protocols need to be exposed as Transport Services. I think this should be based on the services in draft-welzl-taps-transports. Then, isn’t it a bit premature to worry about this second item? Yes I think we can progress fast with draft-welzl-taps-transports, but still it’s only the first version now. I think this item should therefore wait a bit. Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
