Hi, Sounds like a good start!
About this: > On Jun 30, 2019, at 11:34 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What shall we use our face-time for in Montreal? > > Some topics from our last interim > <https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/nots-interim-2019-taps-02?useMonospaceFont=true> > seem like good candidates for updates. Can we refine them with specific to > discuss (and ID someone to launch/lead the discussion)? > > Framing > Implementations > Parameters & Defaults > Yang model > Why do people resist specific protocol selection? (from Yang discussion) I’d volunteer to lead this discussion, but I wonder: is this really worth the time - as in: do we really (still) have any resistance to this idea? Cheers, Michael > ARCH & API open topics > --aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps