I added another option to the pool for the time you’re suggesting. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:05 PM Mirja Kuehlewind < [email protected]> wrote:
> Any chances we can start an hour earlier (given it’s Friday evening…)? > Initially (Dec/Jan/Feb) we used that earlier time slot. Not sure how this > got shifted last time (maybe because me and the IESG meeting…?) > > > > Mirja > > > > > > *From: *Taps <[email protected]> on behalf of Aaron Falk < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, 20. May 2020 at 17:41 > *To: *taps WG <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[Taps] May interim (mea culpa) > > > > Folks- > > It looks like I dropped the ball and didn’t schedule an interim for May. > Further, the etherpad > <http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-taps-interim-2020-apr> is > empty so I have no notes. :( Anyway, sticking to our prior cadence, we > *could* have a meeting on May 29 at the same time as in April: > > EDT/EST 12:00 - 14:00 > > PDT/PST 09:00 - 11:00 > > CEST/CET 18:00 - 20:00 > > UTC 16:00 - 18:00 > > Please fill out the doodle: https://doodle.com/poll/66feg25h9xq2rs7w. If > we don’t hit critical mass, I’ll do another poll for alternate dates. > > Sorry for the late notice. > > --aaron > -- -- aaron Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
