Looks like we do have a critical mass who can make a call next Friday at
the earlier time:
````
EDT/EST 11:00 - 13:00
PDT/PST 08:00 - 09:00
CEST/CET 17:00 - 19:00
UTC 15:00 - 17:00
````
I’ll put the agenda request in now. Please send suggestions for
discussion topics. Otherwise, we’ll go through the GitHub issues
list.
--aaron
On 20 May 2020, at 12:10, Aaron Falk wrote:
I added another option to the pool for the time you’re suggesting.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:05 PM Mirja Kuehlewind <
[email protected]> wrote:
Any chances we can start an hour earlier (given it’s Friday
evening…)?
Initially (Dec/Jan/Feb) we used that earlier time slot. Not sure how
this
got shifted last time (maybe because me and the IESG meeting…?)
Mirja
*From: *Taps <[email protected]> on behalf of Aaron Falk <
[email protected]>
*Date: *Wednesday, 20. May 2020 at 17:41
*To: *taps WG <[email protected]>
*Subject: *[Taps] May interim (mea culpa)
Folks-
It looks like I dropped the ball and didn’t schedule an interim for
May.
Further, the etherpad
<http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-taps-interim-2020-apr>
is
empty so I have no notes. :( Anyway, sticking to our prior cadence,
we
*could* have a meeting on May 29 at the same time as in April:
EDT/EST 12:00 - 14:00
PDT/PST 09:00 - 11:00
CEST/CET 18:00 - 20:00
UTC 16:00 - 18:00
Please fill out the doodle: https://doodle.com/poll/66feg25h9xq2rs7w.
If
we don’t hit critical mass, I’ll do another poll for alternate
dates.
Sorry for the late notice.
--aaron
--
-- aaron Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
