I agree that TAPS in particular is working well in the interim meetings, and we’ll likely be more productive in that forum, when we’re not competing for author’s time in other groups.
If we had proposals for new work and presentations from folks not already in the interims, it’d make sense to meet that week, but otherwise we can do without it. Best, Tommy > On May 26, 2020, at 9:46 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind > <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Martin, hi all, > > I agree that your points listed below are usually good reasons for a wg > meeting. In case of taps I think we reached a working mode where we really > try to fix github issue and get the docs ready for wglc. This might be less > interesting for “tourists” and we probably won’t really have proceedings. So > I’m happy to move this out of the IETF week. Ideally we would be mostly done > even before the 108 meeting 😊 However, not sure where we are with the > implementation draft…? > > Mirja > > > > From: Taps <taps-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Martin Duke > <martin.h.d...@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, 26. May 2020 at 18:08 > To: Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com> > Cc: "taps-...@ietf.org" <taps-...@ietf.org>, taps WG <taps@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Taps] Should TAPS meet during IETF-108? > >> Frankly, I can’t think of a good reason to do so. > > Although I don't have a strong opinion on this question, the reasons to > participate in 108 proper are: > - full support for meetecho, archiving, proceedings, etc > - more participation from "tourists" who have already adjusted their > schedules for that week > - scheduling that ensures the remote meeting time moves around during the > year, meaning it's not always scheduled for the convenience of the usual > suspects. > > If that's not compelling for the WG, that's fine with me. > Martin > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:17 AM Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com > <mailto:aaron.f...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Dear TAPS working group & ADs, >> >> Scheduling has begun for the online IETF-108 meeting in July. Should we >> request a meeting slot for IETF week? Frankly, I can’t think of a good >> reason to do so. We’ve been making good progress with ~monthly Webex >> sessions and my hope is to continue them. Trying to schedule a meeting >> during IETF week will only reduce availability of participants. Thoughts? >> >> --aaron >> > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
