Friends and fans of TAPS, esteemed colleagues,
> On May 9, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: > > Dear Dale, > > Many thanks for this very thoughtful review! (and sorry for the delay) > I’ll give some answers below, as an author of the -impl and an editor of the > -interface document - I hope my co-authors will agree with me, or comment if > they do not. (..) > As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github ( > https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts > <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts> ) for the smaller things below, > in addition to one extra issue that says “check all modal words in the > implementation draft” - and then address them with PRs there. I hope that’s > ok with you? Done. And, it’s now clear to me that some of the “nits” are a bit more than just that - I am now quite sure that a bit of discussion time in the interim would be useful. Is anyone else (an -arch author ;-) ) going to do the same with https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/> ? This looks like *much* less work. Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
