> On 9 May 2023, at 23:57, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: > > Friends and fans of TAPS, esteemed colleagues, > > >> On May 9, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no >> <mailto:mich...@ifi.uio.no>> wrote: >> >> Dear Dale, >> >> Many thanks for this very thoughtful review! (and sorry for the delay) >> I’ll give some answers below, as an author of the -impl and an editor of the >> -interface document - I hope my co-authors will agree with me, or comment if >> they do not. > > (..) > > >> As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github ( >> https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts ) for the smaller things below, in >> addition to one extra issue that says “check all modal words in the >> implementation draft” - and then address them with PRs there. I hope that’s >> ok with you? > > Done. And, it’s now clear to me that some of the “nits” are a bit more than > just that - I am now quite sure that a bit of discussion time in the interim > would be useful.
Agreed (and thanks) > > Is anyone else (an -arch author ;-) ) going to do the same with > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ > ? This looks like *much* less work. I’m on it :) Cheers, Brian > > Cheers, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
