2008/8/24 Jerome Laheurte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Jerome Laheurte wrote: > >> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Frank Niessink wrote: >> >>> You mean you want to make attachments composite? Does that make sense? >>> Why not make it a non-composite domain object, like effort? >> >> Though I agree children attachment are sometwhat strange, I'd really >> like to have notes in attachments. > > And now I realize a NoteOwner is not necessarily composite.
Yay, best of both worlds :-) Cheers, Frank
