Tom Oinn wrote: > Ketan wrote: >> If a full-fledged editor is in place it should bring in the undo >> functionality with it. >> In my opinion, beanshell is *the most* important processor of Taverna >> and plugging a smart editor is worth it. > > I had jEdit working with it two years ago, abandonned because the code > was under full GPL.
Yes it's under GPL 2.0. > Personally I'd be fine with Taverna being GPL but > that wasn't my call. According to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html - <quote> Using the ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage over proprietary developers: a library that they can use, while proprietary developers cannot use it. </quote> so there would be potentially adverse consequences to switching to GPL. > Given the team's limited resources, do I take your email as an offer to > implement this? Congratulations, welcome to the party.... > > Tom Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ taverna-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/taverna-users Documentation: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/usermanual1.7/ FAQ: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/TavernaFaq Biological Services: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/Mygrid/BiologicalWebServices
