Gosh, another 2-week lagged reply:)

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:17, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If I remember correctly JSBML binds to the binary library sbml.so/dylib/DLL
> -- if this is the case you *must* use system classloader, otherwise the
> second run would not be able to relink to the JNI library.

Nope, the idea of JSBML is a pure-Java SBML API. libSBML Java API does
the linking thing.

>
> As to the ?  - it is not possible to have "local" system properties in Java,
> so unless the JSBML allows you to control the xml factory in any way through
> it's API you will have to stay with your workaround.
>
> It might be possible to synchronize on the xmloutputfactory instance if it
> itself has synchronized methods, but.. if it works now I would just leave it
> as it is. ;)

Ok, thanks again for reply and yeap, it works now:)

Best regards,
Mikołaj

>
> On Jun 7, 2011 4:55 PM, "Mikołaj Rybiński" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I rather thought of replacing:
>>
>> System.setProperty(...) + system classloader persistence
>>
>> with:
>>
>> ? + persistence shared with the whole workflow
>>
>> so that I wouldn't interfere with Taverna engine. Is there a piece of
>> Beanshell code I can put in place of "?" ?
>>
>> Mikołaj
>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
taverna-users mailing list
[email protected]
[email protected]
Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/

Reply via email to