Hello Raymund, On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:27:20 +0200 GMT (27/Mar/11, 22:27 PM +0700 GMT), Raymund Tump wrote:
>> This is hardly a selling point for TB!. RT> Actually for me it is. The fact that Ritlabs does not rely on a RT> (rather faulty) IE engine to display HTML mails to be able to control RT> the behaviour is a reason why I would buy it. We've been through this. Not you and I, but me and the beta list: Ritlabs has the choice of catering to a dwindling minority of fundamentalists or giving the user a choice (which would not hurt even the fundamentalists, never mind how vocal they are against reality and choices). Anyway, in the office I still use v4.2.36.4, and the second (completely misformed) HTML mail I sent displays better in that version that in 4.2.44. Screenshot attached. In other words, a previous incarnation of TB! did a better job than the current one. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
<<attachment: Intercon HTML mail small.jpg>>
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.0.153 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
