> Hello Vilius, > > On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:10:29 +0300 GMT (06/Apr/11, 21:10 PM +0700 GMT), > Vilius Šumskas wrote: > > VŠ> What's the point to accept and store self-signed certificate > VŠ> anyway? It ads zero security. > > You are right, it does not add security. However, it adds > convenience.
Convenience? How? > VŠ> This was discussed on this list extensively multiple times, and if > VŠ> you really really really know what you are doing, just add root CA > VŠ> to trusted CAs. > > I tried that, but the result was that I could not send at all any > more. As this is not a beta issue, we can continue the discussion on > TBUDL. Maybe you have added certificate itself, not root CA? I'm not sure about version 5, but it worked for me when I tested it during 4.x beta cycle. If it doesn't work in version 5.0 it needs to be reported on BT and fixed of course. > As I said in the other mail a moment ago, not really important on my > side, but it would be nice not to have to click OK each time I send a > mail. You can do this by using standard plain text connection method. -- Vilius ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html