-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk, Saturday, August 9, 2003, 11:28:41 PM, you wrote: DH> Hello Sean! DH> On Saturday, August 9, 2003 at 9:24:16 PM you wrote: >> That is one point of using Bayesian, but you can use it anywhere >> and train it for your own setup. One man's mail, another's spam :) DH> Didn't ever doubt it, but as it makes much more sense to filter out DH> junk mail before it is sent, and in view of the mails having to be DH> stored, Bayesian filters are best used at server level, not at home, DH> where much simpler filtering is more than sufficient to kill such DH> mails. Given that what one person views as spam is not always the same as another. Most ISPs will not filter 100% of spam out anyway and leave that to us to do with tools like Spampal and Bayesit! :) Sean - -- Fidonet: 2:263/950 ICQ: 679813 Website http://www.tcob1.net THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. What If The Hokey Pokey Is Really What It's All About? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQE/NgWkHMnSWn2nApQRAqH1AJ9McbHOebPWDz9px87RqQvs4GHl6ACfeRXD NjBu8psPsYG2bvVA+YMrowE= =pzlr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.0b1 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
