Hi Boris, On Mon, 23 May 2005 22:15:29 +0200 UTC (5/23/2005, 3:15 PM -0500 UTC my time), Boris Anders wrote:
B> Tony Boom wrote (in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): B> For me, it is. Don't know whether it's an good idea to use @192.168.2.12 B> (see above) but I've no problem with that. IIRC, without looking it up, there is absolutely no spec for a message ID at all. You can use whatever you wish, as long as it is unique for each email. If he wanted to put @chicken-soup it is permissible. :) In fact, many people modify this on purpose, on many groups,to ward off some spammer software which harvest and key in on the message ID. Some email clients, e.g. Pine, even will have a option to encrypt the domain in the message ID, before sending it. -- Gary ________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
