Clive Taylor wrote: > Agree 100%. However, the key word is "if" and this is the continuing > frustration with TB!. But, is Ritlab's focus on developing TB!? The > promised focus on IMAP has been dangled in front of this group for > what seems a lifetime but I've seen precious little evidence of this.
There's evidence there alright. I wouldn't say precious little either. :) It doesn't seem enough though since it really should have been working reliably by now. Seems to be a difference in perceived priority, i.e., us the IMAP users and Ritlabs the developers having to please the entire userbase as best as they can. > Sure, we've had Voyager (wow! another peripheral toy), I wouldn't call this a peripheral toy. Increasing IMAP use and portable applications are becoming more and more common for the same reasons. -- -= Curtis =- PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name -=-=- The first step to making a dream come true is to wake up ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
