Hallo Rick, On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:25:57 -0400GMT (3-6-2007, 4:25 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
RG> Ouch! I know you don't care for folder templates ... Wrong. I like folder templates. I use several of them. I just don't hardcode the addressee in them. RG> If it has been not working as stated for several versions and we RG> have become used to it, it still doesn't make it "as designed" or RG> correct. If something isn't working correct then it's a bug an needs to be changed, but this isn't a bug. You're misinterpreting what TB does. RG> If I clicked on "Write a message to this address" on your email I RG> would expect it to override and let me send it to YOU ... I mean RG> what does "Write a message to this address" mean? Okay, let's check what your action does. You're creating a new message, in this case to me. TB thinks: Wow! A new message, I need a template. Let's check for one. Personal address template for Roelof? No. Group address template for Roelof and some other blokes? No. Folder template? Yes, let's execute it. Hey, a macro: %To="", well let's empty the To: header. Another macro: %To="listaddress", wow, I've got an addressee. And so your template does what you told it to do, not quite what you want it to do in this case or what you expected it to do, but it works as designed. All macros in your folder template will be executed, whether you've entered an addressee or not. Therefore I said that your expectations were wrong. -- Groetjes, Roelof Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions- Bll Gats, 192 http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.8 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM
pgpm9VDn2RQGW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
