Saturday, August 25, 2007, 6:51:13 PM, you wrote:

> In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

GP>> The  point  being  that  Rit  can  take full advantage of whatever
GP>> useful  suggestions  that might be made without anybody responding
GP>> to  what  might  feel like provocative remarks. Such responses are
GP>> unnecessary,  and  counterproductive  to  what  we  are  trying to
GP>> accomplish here. IMO.

GP>> If it might be true that private information has been compromised,
GP>> our  strong  and  fair  moderator  will  deal  with  the situation
GP>> appropriately, I'm sure. We also don't need to discuss the alleged
GP>> compromising here.

> Come on! The title itself is meant to be provocative!

> "Mailing  List Abuse" - where is the so called abuse? It was a PRIVATE
> EMAIL and nothing to do with the list.

I used the word 'abuse' because the person abused the purposes of the
list by (1) not posting to the list, which is fine of course (2) used
the list to obtain my email address, thereby sending me an email which
had nothing to do with _the_list_ but instead served to put me "on
guard" as if to say "...I know who you are" etc. If he didn't have
access to the list, he won't have had access to my email address and
thus would not have sent me such an email. He _knew_ that his actions
were suspect and reprehensible thats why, like a cowardly rat hiding
under a rock, he tried to cover his tracks. Thats the difference
between men and boys.

THAT, is abuse. He abused the _nature_ of the list, in much the same
way those who troll, don't abide by the list, use the list as their
personal raging, ranting and venting outlet, _abuse_ it.

Here, let me help you a bit...

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid=Mozilla-search&va=abuse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse

I'm not sure if English is your sixth language or not, but its clear
to me from your posts that its either (a) not your first language (b)
you're just being argumentative, disruptive and blatantly foolish.
Judging from the posts this thread has received - none of which I've
responded to - since I'm in 'observer' mode until we figure out who it
was on the list.

> Unlike  many  others, he disguise himself behind an alias

Oh, being anon is a crime now?

> and disrupts the purpose of the list.

I don't even know how to respond to that. So, I'll just leave it alone
and leave you to your unfounded and baseless accusations - all of
which are without merit.

-- 
cheers,
 Indie_Dev


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to