Gleason, On 02-01-2008 21:18, you wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Because I heard you accusing TB of ripping people off. If somebody >>> gets the prize for making a big splash, doing little to fix >>> anything, and fading away with people's money, it has to be Slaven >>> Radich.
>> Irrelevant. > If your claim is irrelevant, perhaps you will tire of making it. Your comparison to some other software is irrelevant as I have not paid for the other software to get a working IMAP client. >> Again, we were talking about IMAP, and how "hard" it is. > You were, after you changed the topic which was whether Rit was > ripping people off. It's still the same topic for me. RitLabs has promised IMAP several times and there are still significant bugs. I have upgraded 2 times on the promise of (better) IMAP and now RitLabs wants my money a 3. time in order to deliver what they promised the first time. You don't see anything wrong with that? >>> And if you have bought all the MS Office versions since 97, how much >>> have you paid? >> Nothing. I use it at work. > But it is a little pricey for home work, isn't it? You don't seem to get that my issue is that RitLabs have taken my money 2 times for the "IMAP" feature and now they want it a third time - for that same feature. -- <greeting> Best regards </greeting> <author> Peter Fjelsten </author> <thebat version> 3.99.3 Pro </thebat version><extras> MyGate, AVG </extras> <env.> 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 200K+ msgs. </env.> <os> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 </os> ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
