Hi Vilius, Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 1:23:00 AM, you wrote:
> Oh really? I reported the IMAP bugs on the bugtracker and on this lists. See: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6016 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6017 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6019 > other serious bugs reported by others: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4880 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6127 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3961 (!!!) > Also one could say that IMAP is very difficult to implement. That's > another bu*&$^it. Let me tell you - USA, EU and Russians almost > finished building International Space Station in that time! IMAP IS > NOT ROCKET SCIENCE! Rit (or should I better say developers of Rit) > had 7 YEARS for this and they still can put up their s**t together. I can understand your frustration, and I can tell that you are much more knowledgeable about the tech aspects that I am, really. > I've contacted the support, I've reported bugs, nothing changed. I > should say this "smart-a__" criticism is the only thing that's LEFT. > Maybe then they'll listen (however I don't believe so). I don't use > TB! Anymore, but I'll just stay around and see where this joke TB! - IMAP > story will end. I agree with all of the above - but RitLabs has to look at all features and decisions from a variety of tech and marketing and customer satisfaction angles. They may not do everything perfectly (and neither do I or you), but I think they are making very good efforts on all this, and that is why TB has such a good reputation. Our being impatient or worse really won't help the situation. Thank you in all events for trying to make a good input here. Bob Riley ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.24.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
