-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gary Lucas [GL] wrote:

GL> It seems like it would be better to use a criteria like "bounces
GL> on three separate days" without a reset, rather than on a strict
GL> 15 bounce count. If a mail service was down for a couple of hours
GL> before it got corrected (say it never happens) and during that
GL> time there were more than 15 separate messages (like often happens
GL> in a run on TBUDL)--it seems like that would produce a lot of
GL> false unsubscribes.

Three days is on the excessive side though I do see your point. I'd
more go for 100% bounces over a 24 hour period. But then this could
potentially lead to bandwidth wastage on the part of the list host
having to be receiving 100 bounced over a 24 hour period. It's
therefore really up to Syafril to decide what limits to set.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.1.91 (Win32)

iD8DBQE9TAnHV8nrYCsHF+IRAhc7AJ46nSjZpZ7DHRMEflG+raXZUq7V8wCg4KNZ
STF1ah2S44MgBm3NuyyaWC4=
=MOrZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


______________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to