Hello Alexander, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was written:
CT>> SpamPal AL> My God, NO!!! Nice idea, but it's BRAKE! I tried it, and kill after AL> two days (dialup, but tests on leased line produced same result) Why? I'm using it at work (server here 's to 'old' for SpamAssassin to work) and it works like a charm. All three available plugins are installed and activated and the current Beta-version is really faster than last stable release. So could you elaborate what your problem with SpamPal was? AL> POP3Catcher - http://voyager.pisem.net/POP3Catcher/ I'm unable to 'decipher' the Cyrillic written news, but beside that I don't the concrete reasons why this program is superior to SpamPal?! But the most significant difference: SpamPal _is_ free of charge, while POP3Catcher is free only in a functional limited version ... So convince me :-): Why am I going to prefer POP3Catcher over SpamPal? :-))) XPost & FUp2: TBOT -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) Every program has two purposes -- written and another for which it wasn't. ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBTECH" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
