On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:57:59 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
> Hello Arthur,

> Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:20:13 PM, you wrote:

>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1

>> On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
>> Sean Rima did scrawl:




>>> Hello Dierk,

>>> Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:

>>>> Hello Sean!

>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:

>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1

>>>> OK: What?

>>>> To be more precise: What - went wrong?




>>> I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)

>>> Sean



>> Bother. As I've been explaining to people - those kind enough to point
>> out the error of my ways :) - this filter has been working (apparently)
>> flawlessly for several years. It's been changed to no longer auto-send
>> the reply. I apologize for the inconvenience caused.



> It is one of those things that happen




-- 
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
________________________________________________________

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to