Hi Alex,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:28:44 +0200GMT (14/01/2000, 19:28 +0800GMT),
Alex Sanyukovitch wrote:
OZ>> Maybe it's a bug, but I don't think that it should be corrected
OZ>> until we have a legal way to filter all messages.
AS> I can't understand this logic... How did you found it?
Makes sense to me: If there is .NOT.(''), meaning if there is not
nothing i.e. anything (anything at all), the filter should catch it.
OZ>> What more comments needed?
AS> If it is bug then I have no more questions.
I think it works correctly, according to formal logic. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
