Hi there!
On 15 Mar 00, at 22:17, Stefan Tanurkov wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
> MW> Using the macro
> MW> %RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
> MW> Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
> MW> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>", that is right. But if I save the
> MW> message (as draft for example), change the message and save it again,
> MW> "Return-Path" is set to my reply-address. The Return-Path is now
> MW> "Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". That is _not_ what I want.
>
> But it is exactly what must be in the field accordingly to RFC-822...
...and Stefan is right (as always;-)) here: you should *not* set the return-path
yourself, on the user side you should limit yourself to altering the Reply-To:
header... because return-path: is subject to be set/changed/altered by the
SMTP server...
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
To every rule there is an exception,
and vice versa.
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
