On Mon, 8 May 2000 22:56:13 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:

> alt+v+m when used from the main window is the same as shift+control+e.

Aren't we speaking about the ticker virtual folder window? :-)

> The main problem is getting the ticker to open (time wise). Otherwise I
> could do advanced filtering on the inbox of each account, except this
> one where 2 filters are automatically rather than manually implemented.

Hopefully, version 2's filtering will be an enhanced version of the
present.

AM>> It's not TB! doing nothing.

> TB! insists on counting all messages, including se in subdirectories
> not selecting for tickering. This is equivilent to removing the
> speen of the wrong patient.

The ticker here opens instantaneously.

AM>> It's your old machine that is taking forever to do it's thing.
AM>> It's holding you back.

> OK. You get paid better for removing spleens.

I hadn't reached there yet. You may not have felt that an upgrade was in
order and needed. :-)

> I have probably gotten my money's worth out of this one by now and have
> a PII up at the border.

Probably???!!! I'd say DEFINITELY!!! Yaaaahhhh. LOL.

> If there was a good OS that handled threads well and had developer
> support, a dual processor system might be appropriate. But maybe the
> faster CPU and buses are doing the job.

Dual processor? If you're using the machine you're using now, it's highly
unlikely that you'll need a dual processor system.

> Remember though, some of the problems mentioned earlier here have never
> affected me. For instance, I can open TB! together while other programs
> are opening w no problems.

:-) Thank God for small mercies. :-) Anyway, I hope you do get the
opportunity to do an upgrade soon.

> Lastly, I have what's either a bug or an omission:  TB!'s view
> folder, using message lists, doesn't let you flag for priority since
> no flag menu appears on right clicking. You can do colors, flags
> (via the cursor) memos & colors but NOT designate priority except
> through the main window, because the ticker view window (which tells
> you the name of ONE account - although it *will* contain more)
> doesn't let you do it either.

Yes. I've noticed this as well.

> Another lastly: What's the story with v 142c? What does C stand for,
> Cirujano?

It's a minor revision of the initial release of 1.42. They changed the
method of compression of the executable among a few other things. Not
enough to release it as another version by /number/.

> One more lastly (and this is important) : What if I want to ticker
> to show ALL messages that arrived within a given time frome,
> INCLUDING messages already read.

The ticker will only display unread messages.

> The ticker has now gotten used to being run. (Computers evidently
> undergo a process similar to myelinization). It popped up intantly
> on shift+cntrl+t (although it took over a minute to start moving -
> but it may have been stuck (I had to punch it around a bit) and now
> it's runninng in the background, while the keystrokes are appearing
> as I write. Computers are like women (sometimes incomprehensible but
> necessary. That is not a sexist statement).

This tends to happen on resource challenged systems. As you run a
particular application, it loads it's various components into the precious
RAM space and as a result speeding up by minimising paging. When you move
to another app, it pages a lot initially and then speeds up as it loads
itself into RAM.

> My ticker does not hide by right clicking.

It does here.

-- 
Allie Martin
Using TB! v1.42c on Win2k Pro
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetAlliePGPKey

Tag: "Minds are like parachutes, they only work when open. "

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org


Reply via email to