-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, May 10, 2000, 8:14:19 AM, Sebastian Busch wrote: > is it possible to sign my new messages with PGP, storing the signature > in an mail attachment instead of inserting it in the original message > text. (afair this "attachment behavior" is suggested behavior in rfc, > don't ask which). > Second, The Bat should also be able to scan for and verify signatures > that are contained in such attachments. What you are describing is something along the lines of S/Mime or PGP/MIME, if there is a difference. I don't believe TB! is capable of handling S/MIME which is rather unfortunate, because as you've pointed out, it's the best way of sending signed/encrypted messages. The value of PGP signing all our messages, especially the ones that contain attachments, if clearly evident in light of the recent "Love Bug" disaster. Nick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.3 Comment: Digitally signed to allow for authentication by recipient. iQA/AwUBORmeNsUChHR7o/3OEQLBHwCfWW8MUh5dBaHoRquYRFZLrohMR+8AnA5q EaZ31JQBhTeyg399ec5rta5o =mKeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- -------------------------------------------------------------- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
