Hello Sebastian Busch,
On Sat, 20 May 2000 03:06:03 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, May 20, 2000, 8:06:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Sebastian Busch wrote:
> Hello ron,
>> I haven't been concerned with the read/unread status, but I have
>> noticed situations in which TB deleted the first-received message and
>> left the later message (which had a much later received date). I
>> would prefer to have the first message kept and the later duplicate message
>> deleted.
> 100% agree. Ritlabs could ask when you choose "remove dupes":
> "
> Do you want to
> (o) keep first received message, or
> ( ) keep last received message
> Override (this is an option):
> [ ] keep read message if there is any
> "
> The above choice should be clear. The option overrides this choice,
> wheter TB would wants to remove messages that are read. If the option
> is checked, TB should not remove the read message but the other
> messages. Comments?
Killing the duplicated later one would be enough for me
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.42f with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
