-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 28, 2000, 1:24:27 AM, Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP> But you remember the discussion on PGP-Users about my governments
JMP> claims against PGP in favour of OpenPGP and a possible NAI/NSA
JMP> "friendship"? While with Open Source, you can dismish such claims,
JMP> you
Ummmm... I don't think you can "dismiss such claims" based solely on the
Open Source Code. Remember, one point of the argument _for_ obscurity, is
that with Open Source, not only can the good guys find problems, but so
can the bad guys, only they won't be so forthright in letting others know
of it.
Nick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.3
Comment: Digitally signed to allow for authentication by recipient.
iQA/AwUBOTFS+cUChHR7o/3OEQIHBwCeNGZouJAXSU79wLs1Q/R73SrYthYAoNQ8
maUe1KWau0yO3Lx32B/a0ZGT
=tc1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
