Hello Adrian, On Saturday, June 14, 2014 you wrote:
AG> Sunday, June 15, 2014, 1:10:22 AM, you wrote: >> Well, it helps only in making me realize **once again** that if I continue >> to use >> HTML (in all correspondence except those to TB!) I'm gonna have these >> weird problems AG> HTML doesn't belong in email in the first place (if AG> that "formatting" is actually important, put it in an attachment, e.g. AG> PDF) and particularly not on mailing lists. Same goes for mail AG> from "do not reply" and "no reply" addresses. Well personally I like to have the ability to more accurately express myself with bold or italics or even underline. In my original query I am forced to use asterisks to emphasize text which, in my opinion, should be italicized. I think that if HTML "doesn't belong in email" then I have to wonder why the coders included it in such a powerful and versatile email client like TB!. I'll bet a lot of coding time went into including HTML. If you were using MS Word or some other word processor or even (cough, cough) **Gmail!**, you'd always have those formatting choices available. Why should email be denied those options? Perhaps some arcane, outdated protocol? As Thomas said: "Welcome to the 21st century." -- Best Regards, Jack LaRosa :usflag: Central Alabama Using The Bat! ver: 5.2. Running Windows 7 Pro ver 6 build 7601 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
