Hello Adrian, On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:30:12 +0200 GMT (16-Jun-14, 21:30 +0700 GMT), Adrian Godfrey wrote:
>> And even if the recipient views in HTML, their viewing settings may be >> wildly different to your own, so they don't see what you imagine they >> might. > Not to mention all those crazy colours that make a lot of HTML mails > extremely difficult to read or even legible at all and of course the > wasted bandwidth, particularly for people with smartphones, > tablets, 3G modems and data roaming charges. Wasted bandwidth: Not an issue in the 21st century. 3G modems: Fast enough. I often don't even switch my smartphone from 3G to wifi. Data roaming charges: They are the same, whether the picture (for example) is an attachemnt you have to download and open with additional effort and time, or whether it is embedded without additional effort and time. > You don't get this problem with plain text. Every plain text message > is always legible. No, it isn't. Even MFPA admits that tables are not legible in plaintext. > HTML in email raises immediate "this is spam" suspicions for many > people. Who is "many people"? The Nigerian spams I receive are all in plaintext. Your contribution to this topic was zero. But thanks for the effort. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 6.4.6 under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
