Hallo Januk,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 00:34:49 -0700 GMT (13/08/2000, 15:34 +0800 GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA> That's why I said it should be second. If the
JA> [EMAIL PROTECTED] filter is first, none of these messages
JA> should get through to the second filter.
You're right. ;-)
BTW is there an "exact match" option, rather than "string or
substring match"?
--
Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
