Hi Gary,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:47:46 -0400GMT (26/09/2000, 01:47 +0800GMT),
Gary Mort wrote:
GM> If the only reason is number 1 or 2, S/MIME is a nicer product as you
GM> won't be spamming everyone with a silly signature everytime you send
GM> an email message.
This is the only point with whcih I disagree. S/Mime adds KILO-bytes
to the message. A PGP signature is much samller, and *will* be
invisible, if the display code hides it (it's in the wishlist).
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46d
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
