Hi David,
Tuesday, November 28, 2000, 3:32:07 PM, you wrote:
DTS>> Yes. To me this is another 'bit' which the bat falls short. It is
DTS>> all well and good to tilt at windmills and chant 'no html .. no html'
DTS>> BUT it is there. Plain and simple. It is not going away so how can
DTS>> BAT make working with it easier. It does a good job at making a text
DTS>> version. SO why not pass that on to the reply?
> BUT in follow up I must say that in just going back and testing this I
> do not see this behavior any more <sigh>. Although I *know* that this
> was happening I do not know what could have corrected this.
> SO to BAT .. i apologize. Although I find some bits anoying this is
> possibly the most powerful product out there.
Don't apologize,I have had this behaviour on and off for months, I
just work-around it by copying and pasting text into the reply. It
definitely only occurs with HTML messages and it has nothing to do
with the reply template.
I have not checked any headers to see if the messages affected were
HTML only with no Text part, but I will next time it occurs.
Fortunately I don't receive much HTML mail, and even less that I would
wish to reply to:-)
--
Mark Aston mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gunfleet.com
http://www.gunfleet.com/LinuxGuide
Using The Bat! 1.48 Beta/7
Under Windows NT 5 0 Service Pack 1 2195
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
