-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi dierkhaasis,
On 09 February 2001 at 16:39:12 +0100 (which was 15:39 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote and made these points:
DH> But that opens another question: How come my incorrect "macro
DH> grammar" gave out correct results (see below)? All of my templates
DH> use the incorrect version for weeks now. ?-)
Well, thinking it through, what was there?
%WRAPPED==%COOKIE
The "%WRAPPED=" command expected a quoted string, even if that string was a
macro. So it will look at the next character. It was a single '='.
This will cause an error state. The next command seen is "%COOKIE".
Perhaps the parser finished what it was doing and included the cookie
in its last breath? It's a theory <shrug> :-).
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOoREyTnkJKuSnc2gEQKWEQCfdA+7PLAPAGzyBPf6X9ECgwUQe/4AoIHg
BSaCOPALK/CkyA8mf/erSGQq
=PxYA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
