-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
On 17 February 2001 at 19:41:28 -0500 (which was 00:41 where I live)
Mike Yetto wrote and made these points:
MY> However, many people do reply to the last message they
MY> read rather than creating a new thread and my question concerns
MY> the proper way to handle this. Should the moderators immediately
MY> start a new thread before it gets buried in something many of us
MY> may already be skipping?
By then it is already too late. The proper point to do this is at the
point of a first reply.
MY> Is this even possible?
Yes it is, but you have to change both the Subject and the Follow-up
information.
MY> Does anyone have something else for the moderators to think about
MY> this weekend?
:-)
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOo3bhjnkJKuSnc2gEQLbawCg35jDbjMCjlWlsMb4/WmGQE8ln3YAnjYd
YWLNu41njhObZFtdb2KwGhVL
=3kO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
