On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:05:40 +0000, David Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Hi yahoo > >On 17 February 2002 at 14:58:02 -0600 (which was 20:58 where I live) yahoo 1 >wrote > >> I have seen the webpage for secure bat i was wondering if someone actually >> paid that huge amount for secure bat and was wondering if the money is >> actually worth it. > >Depends wether you think that it is worth it? > >My office is my lap top. I don't want any one to get access to my mail. There are a number of ways to encrypt filesystems or parts thereof that offer more general utility. I question why you would spend the money on something that only protects your e-mail. Windows XP even offers an encrypted filesystem. An upgrade to XP isn't something I would whole-heartedly endorse, but it makes more sense to me than Secure Bat. Am I the only one that is puzzled here? -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
