I understand that there is a server involved with POP3 e-mail, but that server is located off site in a server farm. I just don't see a reason to add ANOTHER server just to collect it.
They aren't using the PIM features of Outlook and TB is one of the most robust e-mail client's I've found, so it seems like the perfect solution for this client. Michael T. Ashby Consultant The Ashby Group http://www.ashbygroup.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================== Thursday, April 18, 2002, 2:13:32 PM, you wrote: PP> Hello Michael, PP> On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 8:25:07 PM you wrote in PP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): MTA>> I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server. MTA>> Everything that they do is POP3 based PP> I'm sorry to tell you: even this is a server :-) PP> MS-Exchange offering to fetch the mail not only via LookOut but via POP3 PP> too is nothing else but: a mail server :-) Not an 'MTA' as 'Mail Transfer PP> Agent', this would the SMTP-capabilities of Exchange offer, but it _is_ a PP> server :-) PP> So if your customer can abandon the PIM functionality every cheaper mail PP> server for Windows will do it. PP> 1.) it will be cheaper; let the money flow to Moldavia for a mile stone of PP> mail client *g* PP> 2.) Let the system not always run on the corner to it's ruin by starting PP> Exchange if this can be avoided :-) MTA>> Unless someone thinks this is foolish. :) PP> As I've already said: this might work, but I've heard it _sometimes_ ain't PP> the most stable solution running TB! in Non-TCP-server-mode. Mail loss was PP> sight ... ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
