-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miguel,
@03 May 2002, 11:34:26 +0200 (10:34 UK time) Miguel A. Urech wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> I missed a point on this email... or at least it didn't come out >> very clearly anyway... the folder had the identity set to what was >> subbed to this list (ie Jonathan Angliss >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). > Try using the %TO and %ACCOUNT macros in your folder template(s). DON'T!!!!! Put tbudl into your address book and put the macros in the address book template. Use of %TO in any folder templates is a very dangerous practice and should be done only in emergency - in situations where address book templates just can't be used: <stock lecture> I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named "Folder Templates". In 150 folders I have two and only two that have folder templates. They are for two specific lists which don't set the reply address properly. There is nothing else for which folder templates can be used that can't be covered and even improved upon using Address Book templates. There are "dangers" in using Folder Templates that are not there when you use AB templates. The dangers are all complacency based and are at their worst in templates which use the "%TO=" macro. If, at the instant you start a new message you happen to be focused on the wrong folder, the message gets given the wrong address. This happens when you click a mailto without changing folders. The results vary from embarrassing to excruciating depending upon the content of the misdirected mail. BTW - another mistake in such templates is to use the construct %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" without a "%TO=''" before it. So any pre-existing addresses are retained. Back to the lecture: every time I say this, someone takes exception to something I've said with comments like "'danger' is a bit harsh" or "I've used Folder templates for ages and it's never gone wrong for me". Here's a fact for you: it goes wrong. That's why I'm writing this message yet again. It works exactly as designed and that design has a fundamental flaw. The flaw is that it places too much responsibility on the user to make sure that the addresses given on a new message are those intended. With address book templates, there is never a mistake of this kind. Replies are perfectly directed. New messages are "a bit trickier". Instead of clicking to the folder then clicking for a new message, you have to click to the right of the new message button and select the list address from the favourites (having denoted that the address *is* a favourite in the address book). </stock lecture> - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQE80nZIOeQkq5KdzaARAinsAKCuyvwI++zpkuo5RjjUgsuDTQmvNACgptob JcK/ex7XfFgbmXNzFU7DlVs= =4urP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
