Hello Sudip, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:21:21 +0545 GMT (12/09/02, 16:36 +0700 GMT), Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
TF>> NAV uses an algorithm that tries to find as yet unknown malware. TF>> Other AV-software will check in their database whether any known TF>> malware is found in the file being scanned. SP> This is not entirely true. Other packages use this method (called SP> Heuristic analysis) as well. In NAV's case this is called Bloodhound. OK, so AVG uses it too. But then, AVG seems to catch only 60-odd percent of the viruses, according to hackfix. SP> Besides, you always have an option to turn Heuristic/Bloodhound off. Also in NAV? TF>> I am using PC-Cillin. SP> How much does it cost? What about footprint? For prices see: www.trendmicro.com I don't know the footprint - how do I check in in Win98? Since I have kicked out SETI@Home, I don't have 100% memory usage any more, so I guess PCC's footprint is within range for my box. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Laughing stock: cattle with a sense of humor. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
