Sh'mae Eddy,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, at 18:09:44 [GMT -0400] (or 23:09 in Wales)
regarding 'Mangled attachments' you wrote:
E> On Thursday, September 12, 2002, 4:36:21 PM, Adam wrote:
E>>> Several TB! users have verified my claims after I sent them my "Test"
E>>> mailbox that contains 2 messages which are corrupt when viewed/saved
E>>> by TB! but are fine when forwarded to others.
AR>> Tried swapping out your ram? You may have a dodgy chip somewhere?
E> I guarantee to five-9's that this isn't a hardware problem. I have had
E> this same problem since the TB! 1.53 days, and that was two
E> motherboards/CPUs ago!
Notice I said "may" - it was merely a base check.
E> Within 24 hours I had a corrupt attachment in my Inbox.
E> All the evidence I have encountered seem to point to a problem with how TB!
E> is processing attachments after they are received.
Or some sort of DLL conflict. I've posted another message with some questions -
can you answer them and see if there is some sort of common ground we can look
at. Its odd how a lot of people don't see this, and those WHO DO see it can
forward to those who don't and it works.
There's a common theme somewhere - all we need to do is find it.
a.
--
12 September 2002, 23:16
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ Checked by Antivir Mail Gateway |
`6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) http://new-wales.net |
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
_..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Adam Rykala http://new-wales.net |
(il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' pgp key - pgp.arykalanew-wales.net | You are here: X
Poor planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
