-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Paul,

@21-Feb-2003, 18:03 Paul Smithson [PS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

PS> I  need  to  do  it on a regular basis and can't get my head
PS> around  why  I  have  to do a three stage process EVERY time. I
PS> would have thought that after the initial sync  it  would
PS> become a two-step process or am I just crazy?

Each synch must be based upon the current state of the mailbase on
the system to be update. With every update it receives, the state
changes. Furthermore, the state of the updated system may change
beyond that of the last know synch point before the next synch is
required. And the synch is bidirectional. I used to synch from
TB to SecureBat, use it awhile, synch back to TB (new beta), use it
awhile, etc. At each synch, the base synch point is moved. A full
synch is the only possible way. Even though you (as a reasonable
person) knows better, the computer does not.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+VtZ8OeQkq5KdzaARAg7eAJ4qOMFbTpH8pdO0yKF6awGSVgiWqQCgxYS2
bF8gRWf95KuVZCDiDxFx4WU=
=ZbFZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to