-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Dear Jonathan,
On 17:42 19.03.2003, you [Jonathan Angliss] wrote... > The RBL lists would block 192.168.0.0/24 instead of just the later > half of the range. I'd see this analogy, with 192.168.* being dial-up and 10.0.* beign fixed-IP customers. > That's an odd stance. Last time I checked (and as you stated), AOL > bounce mail to their own SMTP servers. No, I mean like this: A mail server gets an incoming connection from an IP which belongs to AOL. It refuses this connection except if this IP beongs to the listed AOL MXes. See what I mean? > an example) for example. It just changes your name when somebody does > a lookup. If you're blocking by IP range (which is what RBLs do), > names don't mean a thing. Which RBL are we talking about? Cheers, Johannes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- "AFAIK ist ein Rechner dann relativ sicher wenn er ausgeschaltet ist." ~ Karsten Benkel in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar build 6.5.8ckt09 Comment: Freiheit stirbt in kleinen Stuecken... Comment: KeyID: 0x73D62D41 Comment: Fingerprint: 69C0 50A1 C96A FF3F 3F09 6E91 F9B8 B727 iQEVAwUBPno+XQt4MvNz1i1BAQHDEQf9G73kwfuBgoc7iPdQpWsHpUjGGoZ9F53l 4BFVwmS0n3SVBmBhxuJ96N1XBEiwhVPmnnfj2qLAZk93XT5/5uyjXIJX+dZnkfQl nkSwFVVBprqchLl6tCLEbVVXB5J7WDkBc6cDeseiy4ZozSJrmot1bQPfc805HHP/ 7saBsRSKeATcR9R96eJBb/S6I3HnyHKR/wZXVDV159wytyynN/8s4yn0K7X5eZbu mv7yVzko5cR02RbbADfHN7u22HhJbKhajbvuYnW3klaaRGi78abproDNF/1qmQUU DuDXDOvkdmlgiQ2FPVFeiPnzAym+TisRm9MmIzV2lwdjq+jQa/g09g== =znmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
