On 26 June 2003, 14:00, Tim wrote: > Any reason why you're not using POPFile? I've been getting a few of > this type of spam, and POPFile is correctly identifying them all as > spam. ~~~
I use another anti-spam filter with very good effect on my server. Currently, I'm dealing with over 300 UCE messages per day sent to the five domains for which I'm postmaster. Most spam gets stopped at the server. On a typical day, maybe a dozen get past the filter on my server. That said, the filter has rather conservative settings (i.e. it doesn't use aggressive DSBLs), so I can expect a few to slip through that net. Perhaps I'll look at POPFile -- but I have enough already in the chain between the outside World and my inbox and would rather tackle this irritation in TB if possible. -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 This tagline is false ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html