On 26 June 2003, 14:00, Tim wrote:

> Any reason why you're not using POPFile? I've been getting a few of
> this type of spam, and POPFile is correctly identifying them all as
> spam.
~~~

I use another anti-spam filter with very good effect on my server.
Currently, I'm dealing with over 300 UCE messages per day sent to the
five domains for which I'm postmaster. Most spam gets stopped at the
server. On a typical day, maybe a dozen get past the filter on my
server. That said, the filter has rather conservative settings (i.e.
it doesn't use aggressive DSBLs), so I can expect a few to slip
through that net.

Perhaps I'll look at POPFile -- but I have enough already in the chain
between the outside World and my inbox and would rather tackle this
irritation in TB if possible.

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
--
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
This tagline is false


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to