On Mon 28-Jul-03 6:13am -0400, MAU wrote: >> If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> I'll get any recipient that contains "bill mccarthy" or >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - caseless.
> Right, because you are looking for string "bill mccarthy" OR string > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and you get a match with any or both. Yes, you're just rewriting what I said above. >> However, if instead I have: bill mccarthy&[EMAIL PROTECTED] I do not get >> recipients with both "bill mccarthy" AND "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". For that, I >> can specify each on a separate line - I don't know the trick for doing >> it on one line - bug? Replacing '&' with '&&' doesn't work either :-( > If you look for A&B you are actually looking for AB. Hmm, so '&' is a concatenation operator in TB. Is that documented anywhere? > To get what you want you must have two entries in your rule main set. > The first one will look for string "bill mccarthy" in Recipient AND for > string "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" also in Recipient (two different strings). If > rule 1 AND rule 2 get a match, the filters does whatever. Again, you're rewriting what I just said. -- Best regards, Bill ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
