Hi Vishal, @13-Nov-2003, 20:29 -0500 (14-Nov 01:29 UK time) Vishal said to Marck:
> We could go on debating this forever. Only as long as you keep getting it wrong. > The fact remains, ??? not a fact. A fallacy. You are mistaken. > TB is not as infallible as you make it out to be. Not in question. My only statement (and a *clear* fact) is that TB doesn't wrap on send. > I have seen many instances where what you claim does not happen. No. You just think you have. I can 100% guarantee you haven't. What you have seen was not down to TB. Please stop misleading other users in this forum about your mistaken assumption. > Let's just drop it. No. You are making a false claim about TB functionality in public. I can't let that stand. TB does not wrap on send. That is a fact. PGP can introduce wrapping like you are talking about. TB cannot. Please concede that you are misinformed about the source of the formatting errors you are witnessing. TB won't do it, not without outside interference. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.01.26 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
