Hello Maksym, Sunday, January 25, 2004, 5:07:51 PM, you wrote:
MK> As a result of this behaviour combined with some other MUAs' (e.g. MK> Microsoft-made ones') improper behaviour, there is the following MK> problem reported by various people. The behaviour you propose cause more problems because some systems (especially those functioning in the US and Canada) do not know anything about character sets other than us-ascii (and ISO, if one is lucky) and that caused problem with message processing and the recipient may not get the message. In fact, at the early age TB! was functioning "your" way (i.e. it was setting character set even though there were no characters from that CS in the message at all), but we changed it to the current behaviour after cases caused by systems described above... So, basically, there is no problem on our side to assign non-ASCII character set for messages with only 7-bits characters, but this may be troublesome - this is why we don't want to do that :-) -- Cheers! Stefan
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
