Hi Marck, On Saturday, May 08, 2004, at 4:35:56 PM PST, you wrote:
MR>> So...at least in the notices I've been sent from this "service", MR>> the person using the service is identified (by name, but not by MR>> email address). > Erm - not quite. Take this message as an example? I have sent a > message addressed to '"Melissa Reese on TBUDL" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'. Now, when RiskFreeMail challenge me, > they will say: > You recently sent a message to "Melissa Reese on TBUDL" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How much use is that? None! You're quite right...sorry for my confusion! And thanks for your clarification! :-) All I've done so far in response to my "RiskFreeMail" challenges generated from sending messages to the PGP-Basics lists was to post a small rant at PGP-Basics-OT complaining about some people's (no specifics) use of the "RiskFreeMail" service. :-) I suppose in the case of a mail list, a more general ban on the use of services like "RiskFreeMail" might be in order (just as you've already put into motion). Hopefully, the people currently using the service - or considering the use of it - will take note of such a list policy, and act accordingly. -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys TB! v2.10.01 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
pgpHnfPPyp3Bs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
