> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I > live) you wrote: >>> However, total IMAP functionality >>> isn't quite there yet...
> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be > extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing to put > in the time to learn. You missed my point I think... I am a very experienced user of TB - I use it to manipulate all sorts of filters, re-directs, auto-replies, address list functions as well as plain mail handling - my point was: If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of that functionality - I earn my living using TB! The reason for possibly changing to IMAP is: ISP is prepared to install IMAP. and I can then do all the manipulation wheh I am (frequently) away from the office and the main machine. But.. as I said - I cannot afford screw ups becasue IMAP in the event that IMAP's functionality or lack of?) compromises the email handling set up that I have spent two years refining and developing on behalf of myself and of clients. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 2.11.02 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
