On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 12:49:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Code posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
> regards to New spammer technique? :

C2>> Any training suggestions for BayesIt?

>   IMHO, you don't need bayesit to defeat 99.9% of all spam. I
>   rarely see a spam & I don't use bayesit.

I gave up on BayesIt.  It simply was not catching very much spam.  I installed 
SpamBayes (http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/), which is written in python.  It is not 
a plugin, but acts as a proxy.

It has a nice web-based interface, and it is catching almost all the spam after three 
days of training.
-- 
Jim McMaster                            
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpo8wPk7hpXY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to