Dear Julian, @19-Oct-2004, 00:12 Julian Beach (Lists) [JB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... <snip> JB> The problem is that the name should actually be "Draft Cheshire JB> Supporting People Eligibility Criteria v2.8.doc", ,------/ The name parameter \------ RFC 1341 also defined the use of a "NAME" parameter which gave a suggested file name to be used if the data were to be written to a file. This has been deprecated in anticipation of a separate Content-Disposition header field, to be defined in a subsequent RFC. `------\ End /------ However, the content of the name parameter will be legitimate provided it is a token (no spaces or specials) or a Quoted String (which can contain spaces). ... <snip> So this relates to TB's improper interpretation of a deprecated header parameter rather than the complete excision of body data. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpdZ2H9gu20f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
